🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 stands as among the most fatal – and significant – occasions during multiple decades of conflict in this area.

In the streets where it happened – the memories of that fateful day are visible on the structures and seared in collective memory.

A protest demonstration was held on a chilly yet clear period in Londonderry.

The protest was a protest against the system of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without trial – which had been established in response to multiple years of unrest.

Soldiers from the elite army unit killed 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a overwhelmingly nationalist area.

A specific visual became notably iconic.

Images showed a clergyman, the priest, using a bloodied cloth as he tried to defend a assembly moving a young man, the fatally wounded individual, who had been mortally injured.

Media personnel documented considerable film on the day.

Documented accounts contains Father Daly explaining to a journalist that military personnel "just seemed to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

This account of what happened was rejected by the original examination.

The initial inquiry concluded the military had been attacked first.

In the resolution efforts, Tony Blair's government set up a fresh examination, after campaigning by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

During 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that overall, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the casualties had presented danger.

At that time government leader, the leader, expressed regret in the House of Commons – saying fatalities were "improper and inexcusable."

The police began to look into the incident.

A military veteran, known as Soldier F, was brought to trial for homicide.

He was charged concerning the killings of the first individual, 22, and twenty-six-year-old the second individual.

The defendant was also accused of trying to kill multiple individuals, other civilians, Joe Mahon, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

There is a judicial decision protecting the soldier's anonymity, which his legal team have argued is essential because he is at danger.

He told the investigation that he had solely shot at people who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was dismissed in the concluding document.

Evidence from the investigation was unable to be used directly as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the veteran was shielded from sight with a protective barrier.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a proceeding in December 2024, to answer "not responsible" when the accusations were read.

Kin of the deceased on the incident travelled from Londonderry to Belfast Crown Court every day of the trial.

One relative, whose brother Michael was killed, said they were aware that listening to the proceedings would be emotional.

"I visualize everything in my recollection," John said, as we examined the main locations mentioned in the case – from the location, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the courtyard, where James Wray and the second person were fatally wounded.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I assisted with the victim and put him in the ambulance.

"I experienced again every moment during the proceedings.

"But even with having to go through everything – it's still worthwhile for me."